Sarah Tollefsen, John W. Richards and I are deeply concerned about the proposed legislation, HB 1283, End-of-Life Options (aka physician-assisted suicide) in NH. While proponents say providing individuals with the right to end their own lives is a compassionate option, it’s only one side of the story. If this bill passes, there is great potential for abuse and coercion. Vulnerable individuals, including those with chronic illness or disabilities, will likely encounter undue pressure to choose death to alleviate the burden on their families, or NH’s medical bottom line. Legalizing assisted suicide creates a slippery slope that jeopardizes the lives of those who cannot easily articulate their views.
Once passed, it can be expanded to include those living with chronic conditions like MS or ALS. We have seen physician-assisted suicide expand in other states and it has led to lawsuits, including those filed by California’s disability community. Many patients decide to discontinue medical treatments, put DNRs in place or stop eating or drinking while their physician keeps them comfortable at the end of life. Palliative care and hospice services are available to address pain and improve the end of life for terminally ill patients. These are choices that do not involve helping to kill a patient through physician-assisted suicide. Instead of embracing a path that risks the well-being of vulnerable individuals and alters the fundamental principles of medical practice, NH should focus on strengthening palliative care and hospice services to ensure that every individual receives the compassionate care they deserve in their final days.
Lisa Beaudoin
Concord